Welcome to part two of the two-part series
“Madonna and Baby Jesus” as found at the National Gallery of Art in DC. This time, it’s all about the entourage of
onlookers. After all, when your hobby is
standing around staring at a mother and baby all day, you’re probably a little
eccentric. Once again, all of these
images are available in high res at the gallery website.
Madonna and Child with Saint Jerome and Saint Bernardo of Siena – Benvenuto di Giovanni, c. 1480/1485 |
My first thought on seeing this was that it
had an adorable little girl with Mary.
However, my second observation on the full size version in person was Holy moly, look at St. Jerome’s luscious
eyelashes!
I realize that I have trained myself to
look for weird things, but seriously, they are way more defined than anyone
else, including Mary. Did St. Jerome
have a secret in his closet? Was his
inclusion in the painting sponsored by Maybelline?
My third thought was that Jesus seems to
have fallen in with the pipe plants from Super Mario Brothers at a very young
age.
Moving on to other quirky saints…
Besides the fact that St. Sigismund looks
like he belongs in the most flamboyant of the Hogwarts houses, the main reason
this is here is because I love St. Anthony’s adorable pig.
There are various theories why St. Anthony was often depicted with pigs. Some legends have it that he was a swineherd before he became a saint. Maybe it’s a holy pig. Or an angel pig! It’s just keeping its wings hidden because if
it were to fly, it would make a lot of uncreative swearers unhappy.
Some angels and saints just have
better things to do than gawking at babies.
Big entourage here. A lot of really ostentatious halos blocking
the view for people in the back. Down
front, a couple of angels desperately try to entertain their infant god…
…but he is far more interested in a bird
someone is offering him, as he has a demonstrated interest in mauling small
fowl with his bare baby fist.
But at least some of the crowd are making
their own entertainment.
This lady is way more interested in tooting
her own horn than in paying attention to babies. And from the snicker her friend is
giving her, I assume she is just using it to make fart noises.
Finally, I leave you with this.
Two observations:
- Jesus has no neck.
- Those angels would rather be doing anything else.
Holy crap…not ANOTHER diaper… |
What is it with these medieval artists and their absolute refusal to paint a baby Jesus that isn't horrifying? It's like in art school all of them were like, "I don't know what a baby looks like, uh, I'll just draw some ghoulish nightmare creature."
ReplyDeleteI think it says a lot of what they thought about their lord and savior. "So, God on Earth...I'm guessing he was somewhere between a gremlin and the Children of the Corn."
DeleteWhy is an eyeless dog nuzzling the back of the angel in the last picture? Anyway her sister angel is probably looking at something rather than making a bored disaffected face. A flying turkey, perhaps, pulling a banner with the words "Down with Christmas!" on it.
ReplyDeleteNow I want to make a nativity scene with that turkey flying in front of the star, a la E.T...
Delete" the most flamboyant of the Hogwarts houses' HA! Awesome. Again, so glad you're back!
ReplyDeleteThanks! You've got to admit, he looks like he really enjoys playing with wands. And balls.
DeleteThose eyelashes sure are "defined". I'd call them plain scary but what do I know about eyelashes anyway? Unless they're really defined, of course. Wait! That's NOT an adorable pig. It's like a mini version of a blood thirsty not-so-adorable Daddy Pig. No?
ReplyDeleteThat would make for a much more realistic but scarring children's show!
ReplyDeleteSend in the cops!
Delete